Federal Trade Commission v. Verity International, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Defendants operate a billing service for Internet pornographers. Web sites containing what defendants euphemistically refer to as adult content ascertain the telephone numbers from which visitors to the sites accessed the Internet through a system known as Automatic Number Identification (“ANI”). Defendants then bill the subscribers of those telephone numbers — who may or may not be the same persons who accessed the web sites — for access to the pornographic materials, although most of the bills here at issue described the services for which the bills…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Federal Trade Commission v. Crescent Publishing Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Federal Trade Commission v. Verity International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Federal Trade Commission v. Verity International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Niehaus v. AT & T CORP.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.