Legal Opinion

Drake v. United States Enrichment Corp.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 5:13-CV-00223-TBRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon competing motions for summary judgment. Defendant United States Enrichment Corporation (“USEC” or “the Company”) first filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docket No. 24.) Plaintiff Bryan L. Drake and other USEC employees (collectively “Plaintiffs”) have both responded and moved for summary judgment in their own favor. (Docket Nos. 25, 26.) USEC has responded to Plaintiffs’ Motion, (Docket No. 28), and replied to Plaintiffs’ response, (Docket No. 29). Plaintiffs have replied to USEC’s response.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
Lewis v. Humboldt Acquisition Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.