Legal Opinion

Gross v. Washington State Ferries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1961No. 35797PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Does plaintiff’s 1 failure to file a verified claim with the Washington Toll Bridge Authority within thirty days after the time her alleged claim against it for damages for personal injuries accrued, as required by RCW 47.60.250 2 , foreclose her action based upon the Jones Act (46 U. S. C. § 688) and the general maritime doctrine of unseaworthiness?

Plaintiff, a waitress, was employed by Clark’s Ferry Concessions, Inc., which maintained restaurant facilities aboard defendant’s ferry, Illahee, operating across the navigable waters of Puget Sound between Seattle and Bainbridge Island. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lyons v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Jacoby v. Arkansas Department of EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Morris v. Massachusetts Maritime AcademyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Dobbins v. Texas Turnpike AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API