Legal Opinion

State v. Charles

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 2001No. C9-00-1636PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge

In this appeal from a conviction for second-degree felony murder, appellant argues that the district court (1) committed plain error by failing to instruct the jury on the intent element of second-degree assault; (2) erred by excluding evidence of the victim’s prior assaults against others; (3) committed reversible, error by communicating with the jury during deliberations outside of open court in appellant’s absence and without making a contemporaneous record; and (4) committed plain error by failing to instruct the jury on defense of dwelling. Lastly, appellant argues…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. PilotSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. HendryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. PirsigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State of Minnesota v. Joel Patrick RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API