State v. Charles
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge
In this appeal from a conviction for second-degree felony murder, appellant argues that the district court (1) committed plain error by failing to instruct the jury on the intent element of second-degree assault; (2) erred by excluding evidence of the victim’s prior assaults against others; (3) committed reversible, error by communicating with the jury during deliberations outside of open court in appellant’s absence and without making a contemporaneous record; and (4) committed plain error by failing to instruct the jury on defense of dwelling. Lastly, appellant argues…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. PilotSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JorgensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. HendryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. PirsigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Minnesota v. Joel Patrick RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017