Legal Opinion
Proctor v. McNeil
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 3, 2014No. Case No. 13 C 7519PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION, AND ORDER
AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge:
On December 5, 2013, Plaintiffs, who are retired employees of the Illinois State University System, filed the present one-count Amended Class Action Complaint alleging a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim in relation to their monthly retirement annuities and health insurance premiums. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Class Action Complaint as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Court grants…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kozlov v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Rossidoc LLC, d/b/a The Irish Nobleman v. The City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, and Daniel La Spata, an individualDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Tranchita v. CallahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022