Legal Opinion

Robinson v. McColgan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1941No. S. F. 16377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, as Franchise Tax Commissioner of the State of California, from a judgment directing a refund of the income tax for the year 1936 paid by plaintiff under protest.

There is but a single question of law presented for decision, to wit: Was plaintiff, a nonresident of the United States, taxable under the California Personal Income Tax Act of 1935 [Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8494] on in come from dividends declared on shares of stock of a California corporation, the stock certificates being in the custody of plaintiff’s agent, a California national bank?

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnet v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Miller v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Anglo-California Tr. Co. v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Henley v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Christman v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Danon v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API