Thuesen v. Amerisure Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice'1
This appeal presents an interesting issue of first impression under Texas, Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, a rule adopted in 2013 governing dismissal of baseless claims.- At issue is whether a trial court may consider a Rule 91a movant a “prevailing party” entitled to attorney’s fees under the rule if the trial court determines the respondent nonsuited- the claims to avoid an adverse ruling on the 91a motion. We conclude that a trial court may not do so. We also address whether the trial court erred in consolidating two cases, whether the consolidation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In the Interest of A.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- HMT Tank Service LLC and HMT LLC D/B/A and F/K/A HMT, Inc. v. American Tank & Vessel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Allan Latoi Story v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2022
- Deborah Swan v. Mitzi Dixon, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2025
- In Re Jeremy Lee Garate D/B/A Garate Process Service v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.