Prison Law Office v. Koenig
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANNELL, J.
In this case of first impression, appellant Prison Law Office challenges the constitutionality of Penal Code section 3003,1 providing for return of a parolee to the county of his or her commitment when released on parole. The Prison Law Office contends that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment to respondent Ronald Koenig, Chairman of the Board of Prison Terms.2 We find the provision constitutional on its face and thus affirm the judgment.
I. Facts
After the Board of Prison Terms (Board) formulated a policy of releasing parolees to the county of commitment,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Powell v. KleinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In re TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Wachs v. CurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- State v. RosadoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.