Legal Opinion

Matter of Jennings v. Watt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

In 1932 relators caused to be delivered to the Supervisor of the town of Huntington, county of Suffolk, a petition praying that certain adjoining territory be annexed to the village of Lloyd Harbor, pursuant to the provisions of section 348 of the Village Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 64). The Town Board of the town decided that the petition did not conform to section 348 because the westerly boundary of the territory described in the petition extended beyond the easterly high-water mark of Cold Spring harbor and the westerly boundary of the town, of Huntington extended only to such high-water mark.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. People ex rel. Case v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Osterhoudt v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nance v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. People v. AntonSuffolk County District Court · 1980
  3. Kings Estates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of ChesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Nance v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. O'Brien v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API