Legal Opinion

Crockin v. the Boston Store of Ft. Myers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 16, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The appeal is from an order, the pertinent part of which is: “that unless the plaintiff’s predecessor in ownership of cause of action involved in this suit, to-wit, Wear-Well Corporation, domesticates under the laws of State of Florida, and receives permit from the Secretary ■of State, authorizing it to do business within the State of Florida, in accordance with statute in such cases made and provided, within sixty days from this date, that said cause stands dismissed at cost of plaintiff.”

Three questions are posed by appellant for our determination as follows:

“Does the acceptance by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Cincinnati Mutual Health Assurance Co. v. RosenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Hunter W. Finch & Co. v. Zenith Furnace Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Harris v. ZeuchSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. PeimeislSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Weber v. RegisterSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Oriental Imports And Exports, Inc. v. Maduro & Curiel's BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Doris Berkman v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Odell v. SignerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Berkman v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API