Legal Opinion
Local 875 I.B.T. Pension Fund v. Pollack
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 26, 1998No. 95CV3989 (NG)(MLO)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs allege that the Local 875 I.B.T. Pension Fund (“the Fund”) has been defrauded of $9.3 million — over 20 percent of its assets because it was induced to devote that sum to an investment plan that was actually a scheme to steal the money through financial subterfuge. They seek recovery under the Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). 18 U.S.C. §§ 1861 et seq., the Employee…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hidden Brook Air, Inc. v. Thabet Aviation International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CKB168 Holdings, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Torah Soft Ltd. v. DrosninDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Hirata Corp. v. J.B. Oxford & Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.