Legal Opinion

State v. Abbott

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

— Appellant was jointly charged with one Nick Mitchell and one Clyde H. Smith with the crime of having robbed one Manuel Coster of $10. Appellant was granted a separate trial, was convicted and moved for a new trial, which was denied. He appealed from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.

At the outset appellant urges the contention that where error intervenes in a trial “it is presumed to be injurious to the defendant and he is entitled to a new trial,” citing People v. Devine, 44 Cal. 452. This court has not followed the rule announced by appellant, but, on the contrary, has *63he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CorcoranIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. Dong SingIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Territory v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Territory v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FarnsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. BuchananIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. BoykinIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. JesterIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. CacavasIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API