Earnest v. Ruppenthal
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentWedell, J.
There is no question concerning the fact that funeral expenses constitute a first-class claim against a decedent’s estate. (G. S. 1935, 22-701.) True, our statutes contain no express authorization for the purchase of a marker or tombstone as an item of funeral expense. Nor do they make express provisions for other proper items of funeral expense. By the great weight of *641authority a tombstone or monument,, suited to the conditions of .the estate, to identify 'and protect the remains of a deceased person is now regarded as highly proper and as a legitimate item of funeral expense regardless of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fairman's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- In re Estate of WeringerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Crapo v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Kennedy v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- In re the Estate of KempfMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.