Legal Opinion

Schaeffer v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided September 22, 1989No. Claim No. 77670PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

The issue before us is whether service of a notice of intention to file a claim by United States Postal Service Express *136Mail without requesting a return receipt satisfies Court of Claims Act § 11. While we think it is debatable whether or not the Legislature intended the term "certified mail” to encompass Express Mail, we hold that the claimant’s failure to request a return receipt renders the service defective in any event.

On May 26, 1988, the office of the Attorney-General received claimant’s notice of intention sounding in medical malpractice. It…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Macchia v. RussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Byrne v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Golden v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Baggett v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hodge v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Hodge v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993
  3. Secreto v. International Business Machines Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API