Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Electoral Boards
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided April 15, 1936No. 119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevitt, Judge
The plaintiffs in this case are the following :•
*308
*309
Each of these plaintiffs has all the qualifications required by the provisions of section 18 of the Amalienborg Code of 1906 (Colonial Law of Apr. 6,1906; prec. 1 V.I.C.). The only reason why the names of these plaintiffs were not placed upon the respective election lists in Frederiksted is that they are women.
At the trial of the Order To Show Cause why the names of the plaintiffs should not be placed upon the respective voting lists for the period from April 1, 1936, to March 31, 1937, in the Town of Frederiksted, it was orally agreed to by all…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haynes v. OttleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Hansen v. O'ReillySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Bluebeard's Castle, Inc. v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
- O'Reilly v. Board of ElectionsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Bryan v. AbramsonSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.