Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Stein

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1913No. 7098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Chaffee District Court. — Hon. Lee Champion, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

This action involves the interpretation of certain portions of a contract between The Otero Irrigation District and Noonan and O’Neill. The court found that the district has in its possession $12,908.64 due Noonan and O’Neill, which the decree holds was a fund created by express agreement for the express purpose of satisfying claims for labor and material furnished to, and used by, Noonan and O’Neill in the construction of a reservoir for the district. By reason of these findings it was held that the appellees (who were subcontractors, material-men and laborers under the contractors Noonan…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. German National Bank v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Nolting v. National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Bonte v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. School District v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bates v. Birmingham Paint & Glass Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bishop and Diocese of Colorado v. MoteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Depner v. Joseph Zukin BlousesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API