Horton v. Jack
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Luis Obispo County; V. A. Gregg, Judge. Action by Joseph Horton, administrator with the will annexed of James A. Brown, deceased, against R. E. Jack and the First National Bank of San Luis Obispo. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed as to defendant Jack.
1Opinion of the Court
TEMPLE, C.
This appeal is from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. The complaint shows that James A. Brown died testate October 26, 1889, in the county of Santa Barbara, leaving his widow, Catherine J. Brown, his executrix; that said will was duly admitted to probate, the said Catherine J. appointed executrix, and that she duly qualified as such, and took possession of the property of the estate, consisting in part of certain personal property, which is specifically described in the complaint; that on the fifteenth day of April, 1890, while the said executrix was lawfully…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Estate of DelaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Rutherford v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Hunt v. HuntNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- People ex rel. Dolan v. HerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Allsopp v. Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Deetz v. Cobbs & Mitchell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Horton v. JackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.