Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Cummings

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 10, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNulty, J.

This matter comes before this court on excep-

tions to a directed verdict for the defendant granted at the close of the testimony, the defendant having rested without introducing any evidence. The action is for alienation of affections and the writ is dated August 25, 1947, and the *332case was heard before a jury at the February Term 1948 of the Superior Court for the County of Cumberland. The action is brought under the-provisions of Sec. 41 of Chapter 153 of the Revised Statutes of 1944, and is a special remedy given by statute upon particular facts and is subject to the conditions and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  2. Bundrant v. BoyceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Tomlinson v. Clement Bros.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  4. Shackford v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  5. Farneman v. FarnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jenness v. ParkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  2. Bolduc v. TherrienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. Wood v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  4. Bragdon v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  5. Wyman v. ShibleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API