Legal Opinion
RUTLAND COURT OWNERS, INC. v. Taylor
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 2010No. 09-CV-46PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Senior Judge:
Appellant, Rutland Court Owners, Inc., filed suit for possession of the cooperative apartment occupied by William Taylor af ter it revoked his shares in the wake of a dispute over the building’s plan to provide extermination services for a bedbug infestation. After a bench trial, the court made findings of fact and ordered judgment in favor of Taylor based on its conclusion that he was entitled to an accommodation under the Fair Housing Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3631 (2000). On appeal, appellant argues the trial court erred in finding a violation of the Fair Housing Act and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawlor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Dr. Tadeusz Radecki v. James Joura Carol JouraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Langon v. ReillyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Caesar v. Westchester CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Kravis v. Justice of the Peace Court 17 and MHC McNicol Place, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
- Wilfred Welsh v. McNeil & ElliottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Wilfred Welsh v. McNeil & ElliottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017