Wood v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Pending before the Court are four motions for partial summary judgment.
On July 31, 2008, Plaintiff Ted Wood (‘Wood”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment on Houghton Mifflin Harc-ourt (“HMH”)’s and R.R. Donnelley & Sons (“Donnelley”)’s liability for copyright infringement. (Dkt.# 97.) HMH and Donnelley responded on August 20, 2008 (Dkt.# 123), and Wood replied on September 4, 2008 (Dkt.# 140). Therefore, this motion is ripe for determination.
On August 8, 2008, Donnelley filed a motion for partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anthony Dash v. Floyd Mayweather, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Warren v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Rumsey Land Company v. Resource Land HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. DRK PhotoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Wu v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.