Legal Opinion

Cumby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1931No. 21337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlood worth, J.

1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial is not argued in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, and will be treated as abandoned, -as there is no general insistence on all the grounds of the motion. Mills v. State, 35 Ga. App. 471 (4) (134 S. E. 141). Moreover, this ground is incomplete. It does not appear how the evidence set out therein was material or how its admission could have been harmful to the defendant. Herndon v. State, 38 Ga. App. 117 (6), 119 (142 S. E. 695), and cit.; Wilson v. McConnell, 36 Ga. App. 767 (1a) (138 S. E. 244).

2. Eor no reason assigned did…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Callaway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Herndon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Wilson v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. George v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API