Legal Opinion
Citizens for Appropriate Rural v. Anthony Foxx
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 3, 2016No. 15-1554PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCE, District Judge.
This case involves the extension of Interstate 69 (1-69) in Southern Indiana. The extension, which will connect Evansville and Indianapolis, has evolved over several decades and is scheduled to be completed in the coming years. Plaintiffs filed a complaint on August 1, 2011, raising several challenges to the extension. The district court dismissed part of Plaintiffs’ complaint when ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants on all other counts. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The first study of the 1-69 extension between…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- SEC v. GenAudio Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Gilbert Spiller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- John Gleason v. Chris JansenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.