Legal Opinion
Amann v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1955No. 9286PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*12MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR:
Appeal from a judgment on the pleadings given and entered for the defendant railway company in a tort action brought against it and one C. L. Buettner by the plaintiff Paul Amann, wherein he seeks to recover both actual and exemplary damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff in a fight with Buettner occurring on December 1, 1948, at a time when plaintiff was shop foreman and Buettner a repairman in the defendant Northern Pacific Railway Company’s repair shop at Livingston, Montana.
The pleadings herein are: (1) The complaint; (2) the defendant railway company’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Davis v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SouthwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George Copeland v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Granger v. Time, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
- Najera v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Amann v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- George Copeland v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961