Legal Opinion

Delay v. Rhinehart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: A jury verdict in favor of defendant should not be set aside unless the evidence in favor of plaintiff is so great that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (Kuncio v Fillmore Hosp., 117 AD2d 975, 976, lv denied 68 NY2d 608; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134; Incardona v Home Indem. Co., 60 AD2d 749; Boyle v Gretch, 57 AD2d 1047, 1048). It is for the trier of the facts to make determinations as to the credibility of the witnesses (see, Weber v State of New York, 107 AD2d 929, 931), and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Felt v. OlsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Incardona v. Home Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Boyle v. GretchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. People's Ambulette Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Buckenberger v. C. Clark Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Andrew v. HurhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. State ex rel. H.K. v. M.S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Coraci v. SlavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API