Legal Opinion

Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Limited

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1993No. 92-1533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

986 F.2d 700

1993 A.M.C. 1861, 24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1481

Ting-Hwa SHAO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LINK CARGO (TAIWAN) LIMITED; Abacus Transports and

Forwarder, Limited; Inhouse Trucking Company;

International Warehouse Distribution Corporation; MICC

Venture, A Florida Joint Venture/General Partnership; Sea

Horse Container Lines; Western Overseas Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

and

Groat Brothers, Incorporated, Defendant.

No. 92-1533.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 28, 1992.

Decided Feb. 22, 1993.

Frederic Willard Schwartz, Jr., Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Steven A.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Brook Ledge, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1997
  2. Tayloe v. Kachina Moving & Storage, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  3. Daybreak Express, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Daybreak Express, Inc v. Lexington Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Burr Computer Environments, Inc. and J. Supor & Sons Trucking & Rigging Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API