Legal Opinion

United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Paul D. Wood, and Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1992No. 90-2184, 91-2007 and 91-2008PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

A two-count indictment charged Defendant-appellee, Paul D. Wood, with making false statements to FBI agents, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and obstruction of justice. Id. § 1503. Both counts were based on alleged false statements Defendant made to FBI agents who, on behalf of a federal grand jury sitting in Arizona, were investigating allegations of corruption against Peter MacDonald, the former Chairman of the Navajo Nation.

At the close of the government’s case, Defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal. The district court raised the issue of whether count 2 — the obstruction of…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Smith v. Ingersoll-Rand, Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. James Ned GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Michael D. ShinaultCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Paul D. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API