Commonwealth v. Simon
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1DissentBotsford, J.
(dissenting, with whom Marshall, C.J., and Spina, *302J., join). As the court recognizes, since the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) (Miranda), persons in Massachusetts subject to custodial interrogation by the police have been entitled to receive, at the threshold of the interrogation, a recitation of what have become known as the Miranda warnings: that they have right to remain silent, that anything they say can be used against them, that they have a right to the presence of an attorney, and that, if they cannot afford an attorney, one will be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.