People v. Tucker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Good cause for the delay of trial exists when an incarcerated criminal defendant is under quarantine to prevent the spread of infectious disease. A contrary holding would require trial court personnel, jurors, and witnesses to be exposed to debilitating and perhaps life-threatening illness. Public health concerns trump the right to a speedy trial.
Jesse Alan Tucker appeals his conviction, by jury, of grand theft of an automobile (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (d)(1))1 and receiving stolen property. (§ 496, subd. (a).) The jury also found true an allegation that appellant had served a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elias v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Estrada v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Estrada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- People v. DiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022