Legal Opinion

Santander Bank, N.A. v. BB&T Corporation

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01669Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SANTANDER BANK, N.A., : Civil No. 1:17-CV-01669 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : BRANCH BANKING & TRUST CO., : : Defendant. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson MEMORANDUM This is an action under Pennsylvania’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“PUFTA”). Plaintiff, Santander Bank, N.A. (“Santander”) seeks to avoid a transfer of more than sixteen million dollars that was made to Graystone Bank (“Graystone”), a predecessor of the defendant, Branch Banking & Trust Co. (“BB&T”). The case is presently before the court on a motion for summary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API