Banks v. Regan, 21929 (1-11-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Peter Regan appeals pro se from a judgment entered after a bench trial of a landlord-tenant small claims petition and counterclaim. The judgment awarded the plaintiff, Reshawna Banks, $600, representing her security deposit, minus $298.76 awarded Regan on his counterclaim for damages to the leased premises.

{¶ 2} Regan has filed a brief with this court; Banks has not. Although Regan has filed a lengthy brief, he has not complied with several of the briefing requirements of App.R. 16(A). Regan is responsible for complying with the appellate rules notwithstanding his pro se status.…