Legal Opinion
United States v. De Jesus
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided August 9, 2000No. Crim. 00-321(HL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAFFITTE, Chief Judge.
Defendant has moved to dismiss counts two and three of the superseding informa-, tion for lack of jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 29. For reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion is hereby denied.
Discussion
1. Count Two — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1882 1
Defendant argues for the dismissal of count two of the information against him. Count two charges Defendant with “unlawfully and knowingly” going upon the naval installation known as Camp Garcia in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382. Dkt. No. 22. The information refers to Camp Garcia as being “on lands reserved for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greer v. SpockSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-MontanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. MowatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. HolmesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. De-JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. ZenonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Zenón-RodríguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. ZenonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- Mercado-Salinas v. Bart Enterprises International, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.