Legal Opinion
United States v. Holmes
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 14, 1976No. Crim. M-75-0715PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
Memorandum and Order
In an information filed on October 17, 1975, the government has charged Carol S. Holmes, defendant, with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382 1 in that on or about August 22, 1975, she entered Aberdeen Proving Grounds, 2 at Chillbury Point, for a purpose prohibited by a lawful regulation, that is, Aberdeen Proving Grounds Regulation 190-4 (APGR 190 — 4) 3 and 33 C.F.R. § 204.-30. 4
Defendant appeared before Magistrate Paul M. Rosenberg on September 4, 1975, and requested trial in the United States District Court. She was arraigned before…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Greer v. SpockSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Parrilla BonillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. James W. DouglassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Kristine D. VasarajsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Nika Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Fitzgerald v. Penthouse International, Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.