Legal Opinion
Vigorito v. Allard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.
In this action the plaintiff sought to recover a balance of $500 alleged to be due from the defendant on a contract for the sale of certain aluminum storm windows and doors. In his complaint the plaintiff alleged that on or about May 18, 1954, the defendant ordered twenty-one aluminum storm windows and three aluminum storm doors from him and agreed to pay $700. The defendant entered a denial of this allegation, and it follows that it was this issue *71that came on for trial on the complaint. The defendant also filed a counterclaim and in it alleged that the plaintiff had agreed that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murray v. Supreme Lodge, New England Order of ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Sortito v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Lane v. McLaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Abington Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Somers Oil Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Abington Mutual Fire Insurance v. Somers Oil Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Ambassador Limousine Serv. v. D'antonio, No. Cv95-0545645 S (Jan. 8, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Arden v. Canadian Cool, Inc., No. Cv 93 54350 S (Apr. 21, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Braun v. Connecticut Light and Power Co., No. 700650 (May 16, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.