Legal Opinion
In Re Hallock
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 5, 1993No. Bankruptcy B-87-06901-PHX-SSCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SARAH SHARER CURLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.
By letter dated January 24, 1992, DALE C. HALLOCK, on behalf of himself and his wife, GEORGEANNE G. HALLOCK (the “Debtors”), requested that this Court set a hearing to determine to what extent a tax penalty due and owing by the Debtors to the United States, collected by the Internal Revenue Service, an agency of the United States (“IRS”), could be discharged in bankruptcy. Pursuant to an Order dated February 6, 1992, the Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing for March 31, 1992, on certain issues. Because the Debtors appeared…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Holywell Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Arthur Carol Sanford, Debtor. United States of America v. Arthur Carol SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Upton Printing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1995
- East Wind Industries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Karlsson v. United States (In Re Karlsson)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000