Legal Opinion

In Re Arthur Carol Sanford, Debtor. United States of America v. Arthur Carol Sanford

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 29, 1992No. 91-5870PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals the United States District Court’s order affirming the judgment of the bankruptcy court, which reduced Debtor’s tax. penalty liabilities by two-thirds without publishing relevant factual findings. These tax penalties were imposed pursuant to I.R.C. §§ 6651(a)(1), 6651(a)(2), and 6654(a). We hold that the penalties imposed under these sections must be waived or imposed in their entire- ■ ties, according to whether Debtor makes the factual showing statutorily required for waiver of the penalties. Therefore, we vacate the district court’s judgment and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re: Combustion Engineering, Inc. First State Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. In Re W.R. Grace & Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  3. In Re: Highland Superstores, Inc., Debtor. Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Highland Superstores, Inc. v. Strobeck Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. In Re TurnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1993
  5. In Re G-I Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2010

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API