Legal Opinion
Daien v. Ysursa
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided May 5, 2010No. CV 09-22-S-REBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER (AMENDED)
RONALD E. BUSH, United States Magistrate Judge.
The following Memorandum Decision and Order replaces the Court’s Order dated April 19, 2010 (Docket No. 39). The amendments are not substantive and the Court’s analysis and conclusions are unchanged.
Currently before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 28) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 29). Both parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. (Docket No. 19). The Court has carefully reviewed the record; considered the oral…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CITIZENS IN CHARGE v. GaleDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2011
- Libertarian Party v. JuddDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- OPENPITTSBURGH.ORG v. DEFAZIODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021