United States v. Amado
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Elias Vega Amado appeals two district court decisions denying his respective motions for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because these appeals do not require us to address the scope of the district court’s authority under § 3582(c)(2), we review its decisions only for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Kurtz, 819 F.3d 1230, 1233 (10th Cir. 2016). Wading through this imbroglio, we affirm the district court’s decision to deny Defendant’s first motion, vacate its decision to deny his second motion, and remand with instructions to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BattlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Anthony Ray Ford v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
- Harms v. LillieDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026