Legal Opinion

I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Slyman Industries, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 31, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-0847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

The parties have moved for a clarification of this Court’s Order of August 23, 1988. In that Order, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs (the “Fund”) with respect to the obligations of several employers, the Defendants herein (the “Employers”), to contribute accrued benefits to a multi-employer benefit plan organized under ERISA. The issue now before the Court is the propriety of the award of post-judgment interest contained in that Order.

The Order granted interest at a daily rate of $56.12, accruing from the date of judgment.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Speckmann v. Paddock Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Capital Restoration & Painting Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Plan A, a Benefits v. Slyman Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Brighton Painting CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund v. BinghamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  5. Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund v. Integrity General Engineering Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API