State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Whitehead
Missouri Court of Appeals
1DissentMaus, Judge
With respect for the majority opinion and the authorities cited and supporting that opinion, I must dissent. For the purpose of this opinion it must be assumed the decedent was negligent. But, that is not determinative of the issue presented. The issue *202is whether or not the plaintiff insured against the risk that resulted in the injury. I believe the accidental injury resulted from the decedent’s negligence in his actions as a juvenile officer and a deputy sheriff, not from negligence in the use of the automobile as those terms are employed in the policy.
This conclusion is not contrary to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. HigginbothamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- National Union F. Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. BruecksNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
- Norgaard v. Nodak Mutual Insurance CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.