Legal Opinion
Bramble v. Kellogg
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1923No. Docket No. 151Published
Error to Calhoun; North (Walter H.), J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by James Bramble against James H. Kellogg and others on a bond. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiff Bramble brought attachment in justice’s court against Conrad, a share tenant on his farm. Under the writ the officer seized 77 bushels of wheat. James H. Kellogg, claiming the wheat, gave bond' for its release as provided by 3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14343, with his father, A. W. Kellogg, and A. W. Sayre as sureties. The condition of the bond was—
“that if, in a suit to be brought on this obligation within three months from the date hereof, the said James H. Kellogg shall establish that he was the owner of said goods at the time of said seizure, and in case of his failure to do so, if the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldstein v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re the Transfer Tax Estate of HellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Preston v. NewcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1907