Legal Opinion

Valder v. City of Grand Forks

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided September 30, 2003No. Al-03-68PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are Motions for Dismissal filed pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by all of the Defendants: the City of Grand Forks, John The-len, the North Dakota Mental Health Association on behalf of Mountainbrooke, and Judge Debbie Eleven. The Defendants argue that the Plaintiffs complaint fails to state a claim for relief. The Plaintiff, Henry Carl Valder, has failed to respond to the Defendants’ motions. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(C), the failure to respond may be deemed an admission that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Alsbrook v. City Of MaumelleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Lollar v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. M.P., by and Through His Parents and Natural Guardians K. And D.P. v. Independent School District No. 721, New Prague Arlene PexaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Faibisch v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Altoona Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Gipson v. Popeye's Chicken & BiscuitsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  3. Harris v. GentileDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
  4. Krach v. HolcombDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API