Legal Opinion

Est. of Cameron v. Kuster, Exec.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1968No. 1067A78PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBierly, J.

— This is an appeal from a nunc pro tunc order admitting an alleged codicil to probate, as of a date more than two years prior to the entry of-the order.

The original order of probate was dated May 17, 1965, and on March 23, 1967, the executor filed a motion to. correct record, to which motion appellant George S. Coggeshall filed objections. On July 19, 1967, the Noble Circuit Court granted the executor’s motion to correct the record.

The trial court’s order book entry, inter alia, stated:

“(3) That such written instrument purporting to be a .codicil to such decedent’s Last Will and Testament…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Estate of CaruchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. In Matter of Will of EakinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Troxel v. TroxelIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brown v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Squarcy v. Van HorneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Modlin v. RiggleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Wilkinson v. RitzmannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API