Legal Opinion
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska v. Barnett
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided February 24, 2003No. 8:02CV126PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATAILLON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on defendants’ (attorneys general of South Dakota, Missouri and Iowa) motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, Filing Nos. 64 and 88, and defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Filing Nos. 36 and 86. Defendants have also moved for judicial notice. Filing No. 46. Each of the attorneys general has sued the Omaha Tribe, Omaha Nation Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Omaha Nation Tobacco Company, and other entities…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bell Paper Box, Inc. v. U.S. Kids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stroman Realty, Inc. v. WercinskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Stroman Realty, Inc. v. WercinskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008