Legal Opinion
Feinstein v. Kaye
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBubenstein, J.
Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint under rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The plaintiffs are Morris Feinstein, his wife and daughter, and the defendants are Arthur A. Kaye, a member of the bar, his law partners and the Brooklyn Edison Company, their client.
The complaint purports to set up a cause of action for alleged slanderous words uttered by the defendant Kaye during summation in the trial of an action in which plaintiffs sued the corporate defendant to recover money damages for an alleged assault. The present motion is based upon the official…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hoeppner v. Dunkirk Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Marsh v. . EllsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thornton v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Wilson v. Retail Credit CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1971
- Simon v. PottsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Feinstein v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Martin v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.