Legal Opinion

United States v. Lofink

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 29, 2009No. 08-3204PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware sentenced Defendant Anthony Lofink for his convictions on charges of wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Lofink had moved for a departure from the Guidelines range contained in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”), but the District Court denied the motion on the basis that it had taken Lofink’s arguments into account when fashioning his sentence. Because our precedents require district courts to decide departure motions on their…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Spears v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Johnny GunterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. FumoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Vazquez-LebronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Blaine HanderhanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API