Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwin Seda

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 30, 1992No. 1691, Docket 92-1122PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal by the Government in a criminal case raises the issue whether an indictment may simultaneously charge bank *780fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (1988), and making false statements to a bank in connection with loan applications, in violation of 18 U.S.C: § 1014 (1988). The issue arises on the Government’s appeal from the February 13, 1992, order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Louis L. Stanton, Judge), ruling that the indictment of defendant Edwin Seda was multiplicitous and requiring the prosecution to elect between the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Kurian ChackoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. DupreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph v. NASH, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi and Roz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Conley D. WolfswinkelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API