Wrape v. North Carolina State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The parties stipulated the construction work on Highway #49 was completed in accordance with the plans and specifications of the Highway Commission and pursuant to its contract. A tort claim, therefore, must be based on faulty plans or faulty specifications. Consequently, a showing of negligence on the part of a designated highway agent in making the plans or in preparing the specifications, is necessary before an award may be made against the State Highway Commission. The Tort Claims Act (G.S. 143-297) provides: “That the claim must contain . . .(2) the name of the department, institution,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Floyd v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Eller v. Board of Education of Buncombe CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Flynn v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ayscue v. N. C. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Zimmer v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Myers v. McGradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Brooks v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968