Legal Opinion
Paula Szyjka v. Peter Vandermeer
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 28, 2015No. 14-1439Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Appellants Roman Szyjka and Paula Szyjka brought this medical-malpractice action against Dr. Peter Vandermeer and others, alleging that Dr. Vandermeer improperly failed to identify an abnormality in Mr. Szyjka’s brain. A jury trial resulted in a defense verdict. We affirm.
Appellants first challenge the district court’s ruling that one of their experts, Dr. Joseph Landolfi, a neurologist and neuro-oncologist, could not testify regarding the standard of care for radiologists. The district…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cooper v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Tavon MouzoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Weimer v. HetrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Henry L. Hardin v. Ski Venture, Incorporated, D/B/A Snowshoe Resort, a West Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.