Dobson v. Dobson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
No serious claim is made that Joseph Dobson lacked testamentary capacity. The will was attacked principally upon the ground that it was the result of undue influence exercised upon the testator by his son, Milburn Dobson. The contestants rely heavily upon the fact that the will gives Milburn the bulk of the residue of his estate. We might, without great difficulty, conclude that in equity the instrument provides an unjust distribution of the estate. However, we may not consider it in the light of what we may deem just or unjust. If it was made by Joseph Dobson with full testamentary capacity,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Schaefer v. ZiebellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Gevers v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Langer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estate of BealeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re Estate of JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Estate of McGonigalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Plainse v. EngleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Fillar v. Estate of FillarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.