Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stevens v. Stevens

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1912Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery county; the Hon. Thomas M; Jett, Judge, presiding.

1Dissent

'Mr. Justice, Carter,

dissenting:

On the facts presented in the record I cannot concur in the foregoing opinion. I think the deeds were delivered.

The rule is, that a deed does not take effect unless it is delivered by the grantor during his lifetime, either directly or in escrow. Such delivery “may be by acts without words or words without acts, or both, and anything which clearly manifests the intention of the grantor that a deed shall presently become operative and effectual, that he loses control over it and the grantee is to become possessed of the estate, constitute's a sufficient…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Hill v. KreigerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. White v. WillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Chapin v. NottIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Potter v. BarringerIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API